localoutline

A new way to browse
  I've been lucky to have some great teachers in the area of big media and computer networks, notably Marc Canter and Adam Curry. Marc is the founder of Macromedia, the company that created Director, Shockwave, Flash and Dreamweaver; and Adam is one of the founders of MTV, and went on to become an early Internet entrepreneur. Both have new companies in 2001 to develop technologies that are related to the stuff we're doing at UserLand. I know that Marc and Adam spent a lot of time talking last year, so the ideas that I explain here are a mix of Marc, Adam and me, Dave Winer.
  Also, I'd like to pay special homage to the Grateful Dead, who have generously allowed their creations to be used to bootstrap new technology in non-commercial ways. To get this process going, we need a content base to get started with. So many technologists, me included, love the music of the Dead. I think they may have left a legacy for technologists that's as important as the legacy they left in music.
The click-wait system
  When I started talking with Adam late last year, he wanted me to think about high quality video on the Internet, and I totally didn't want to hear about it. Like a lot of people, I had tried it, and found it unsatisfying and frankly, exhausting.
  I thought that video on the Internet was a loser for three reasons, that build on each other:
  1. When I click on a link to view some video, I have to wait.
  2. The wait is longer than the video. (In other words I have to wait two minutes for ten seconds of video.)
  3. The quality is horrible.
  All three effects are bad, but the first is the worst. The Internet lifestyle is frenetic. There's no time to wait. The remaining two negatives only make video less attractive, but the first is the killer.
  But Adam persisted and showed me that if I was willing to change my point of view, it could work, without any waiting and with very high quality.
No click-wait
  What if, in the middle of the night, while I'm not using my computer, it downloads huge video and audio stuff to my local hard drive. Then when I arrive in the morning there are fresh bits, news clips, a song of the day, whatever, provided by all kinds of content providers, from big TV networks like CNN and MSNBC, to a Dutch school where kids are taking a film class using inexpensive video recorders and iMacs.
  Let's see what happens with 1, 2 and 3 in this scenario.
  1. When I click on a link to view some video, it starts playing immediately, because it is already on my local disk.
  2. The wait is zero.
  3. The quality is limited by the size of my local disk, not by the capacity of my connection.
A different user interface
  What's different about this system is that you subscribe to channels instead of clicking-and-waiting. I feel that nothing is lost with this approach, because video on the Internet never worked for me, and probably for many others. However, streaming news items through RSS works quite well, and it's a simple matter to teach RSS about multimedia payloads.
  Of course there's a change in user interface. You never see a video or music document until it's fully downloaded. The computer does the waiting, not you. In the system that Marc and Adam envision, a video DJ, someone like Adam at MTV in the 80s and 90s, someone whose judgment you trust, or whose tastes you like, is pushing high fidelity bits onto your hard drive, using no more hardware and network connections than you already have.
  In the world that Adam and Marc envision, there is no central authority, no spectrum to allocate, it's open to amateurs, like the Internet itself. We are not hoping to recreate the flat everyone-is-the-same world that television dictates, quite the opposite. With inexpensive video and audio recorders, and personal computer-based editing systems, all you need is time, ideas and passion to create; and with a format for subscriptions, everyone who wants to, can be a content provider.
A new element
  So that's the philosophy, now let's put some meat on the bones.
  "RSS" already does most of what we want. With the addition of the <enclosure> sub-element of <item> any RSS element can describe a video or audio file (actually any type of file).
  <enclosure> has three attributes: url says where the file is located, length says how big it is, and type says what its type is. This way a workstation or aggregator can know in advance, without having to do any communication, what it's going to get, and apply scheduling and filtering rules.
An example
  Here's an example of a RSS file that delivers a different Grateful Dead song to subscribers every day.
  http://www.ourfavoritesongs.com/users/dave@userland.com/rss/gratefulDead.xml
  Each <item> contains an <enclosure> as explained above.
  <enclosure url="http://www.scripting.com/mp3s/touchOfGrey.mp3" length="5588242" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  I've configured my system to download enclosures between 1AM and 4AM, a time when I don't use my computer.
  When I arrive at work, I check the incoming Log and see there's a new song.
  I click. It plays.
  No wait.
Software
  My company, UserLand, has a product in development called "My.UserLand On The Desktop" that supports both sides of this format. You can use it to create channels that have <item>s with <enclosure>s, and it manages downloads for these channels. So it's both an authoring and viewing tool.
  It's a bootstrap, and it's open, meaning that anyone can develop software that works on either or both sides of this connection.
  Adam's company is doing a graphic environment for music and video on PCs in Java. Others are welcome to join up and do software for all kinds of computers, content and people.
A touch of grey
  I anticipate complaints along these lines -- "This is just email."
  But it's not. First, everything on the Internet is just like something else. Or if it's any good it's just like everything else.
  If you try to push video and audio through email you'll find the client user interface as daunting as the wait-click Web experience. How do I keep enclosures from downloading while I'm accessing email from a phone connection in a hotel? Sure, you could add a complex dialog to an already overly-complex email client user interface, and the result would be that no one could set it up properly and no new video would actually get to the desktop. (You'd hate the feature until you figured out how to turn it off.)
  Further, when you view video in a client that wasn't designed for it, it can look techy and sterile. I believe that's why Adam and his team are doing such a gorgeous graphic environment for video.
  Another important point, there's no reason that RSS can't be delivered via email, in fact we plan to do that. But first we need a format that can carry the payload we want it to carry. In the end it may all run over email, but first we have to step outside its limits and create a variety of different environments and see what people like and what works.
  Dave Winer